Mrs. Joe Wilkins, Purchasing Manager, DTEB Company, 875554-042 Down town,

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Mrs. Joe Wilkins, Purchasing Manager, DTEB Company, 875554-042 Down town, USA. Dear Sir/Madam, It’s my pleasure to introduce, user friendly software which can act as an effective assistant of you by reducing your work loads. I have been walking around offices by creating awareness to people over the past few months. Many insurance companies had accepted my software and they were happy due to my visit. I am proud to help you by making your work easier and reducing your operational costs. I am very happy to show you the features and demonstrate the function of my new userfriendly software, which has greater capabilities to help you. If you want to reduce the number of workers in your firm, this software is an outstanding tool to help you do that. Betty Love Willamette Valley Software DevelopersAs

Explain the concept of “Alternative Matrix”, and give an example of comparison using this form of Matrix to present three acquisition methods.

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Question One

Explain the concept of “Alternative Matrix”, and give an example of comparison using this form of Matrix to present three acquisition methods.

Note: Do not use the slides or Book example.

Answer:

 

Question Two

Suppose you are hired by a mega service company (e.g., Saudi Electricity Company).  Your new role is the Chief IS Architect in charge of overseeing the establishment of the e-Business Infrastructure.  The company decided to offer services through an Electronic Customer Relationship Management Channel or (e-CRM).

Here are the major requirements for the IS Architecture:

  • The company has more than 25 Million customers including individuals, enterprises, and government institutes.
  • Customers’ records are stored into a DB2 server from IBM running MVS operating system.
  • Employees and suppliers’ files are stored on an Oracle database to facilitate end-to-end eProcessing.
  • Individual customers can access the new e-CRM using multiple platforms including mac, windows as client PCs, tablets and smart phones (iOS and Android) as handheld devices.
  • Under no circumstance, shall the customers be allowed to access the back-end DB.
  • There are 2 intermediate layers that reside between users and the enterprise IS.
  • Customers are given the authority to establish/modify/configure services online, so all communication with customers are encrypted and strong authentication mechanism is in place.

Based on the given requirements, complete the diagram below with the necessary information, write the required information on the space provided.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer

Question Three

Suppose you have to perform requirement analysis for a web-based forum system. There are only two type of users that interact with such a system: regular users and administrators. Each type of user has different set of responsibilities. Both type of users can sign in to the system, and part of signing in is an internal authentication process. Both type of users can also register with the system, which also uses internal authentication. After logging in, everyone can post new messages to the board, however only administrators can check statistics and create new threads. Regular users can send private messages to other users, while administrators do not have this ability.

Draw a use-case diagram that contains actors, use cases and their relationship from the scenario described above.

Answer:

 

Question Four

Consider an abstract class Duck, representing all available ducks. Every duck can quack and walk, which are their publicly accessible functionalities. While every duck walks the same way, they quack differently which makes quacking an abstract feature of a duck. Every duck has a weight which determines their ability to float, which can be checked by everybody through can Float method. The weight of a duck can be set through a method available only for all concrete duck implementations. A rubber duck, a kind of a duck, has all the features of a duck (yes, it quacks), but when asked to walk – it acts differently, because a rubber duck can’t walk, so it overrides a duck walk feature and does nothing. Another example of a duck is a wild duck that apart of quacking and walking, can also fly.

Draw a class diagram depicting classes, with names, attributes and methods along with proper relationship between classes. Skip constructors and destructors, but don’t forget to annotate elements visibility using UML notation. For the actual attributes types or method signatures you can use Java notation, if you wish. Precede a name with a ‘/’ symbol to indicate slanted (italicized) text.

Answer:

 

 

 

 

MPM344 Project Risk Management

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

 

MPM344 Project Risk Management

Medical Needs Risk Management

Connie Farris

11/17/2018

 

 

 

Table of Contents

Project Outline. 3

Project Description. 3

Method (Agile or Waterfall) 3

Overall Risk Management Strategy. 5

Risk Categories. 5

Project Risk Identification. 6

Project Risks. 6

Risk Register 6

Project Risk Analyses. 7

Qualitative Risk Analysis. 7

Quantitative Risk Analysis. 7

Project Risk Response Strategy. 8

Risk Response Strategy. 8

Project Risk Controlling. 9

Plan for Reviewing Risk Responses. 9

Identification of New Risks. 9

Project Risk Communications Plan. 10

Communications Matrix. 10

Memo to the Project Sponsor 10

References. 11

 

 

 

Project Outline

Project Description

The quality standards of medical devices contain many aspects such as design control, Risk management, vendor management etc. In this paper we are going to discuss the importance of Risk management for medical devices and steps to perform during the product development stage. Risk management is a critical part of the medical device product development lifecycle. It helps medical device developers ensure that the product is reliable, works as expected and will be no harm to the patients, operators or the environment. In other words, the main purpose of the Risk management cycle is to reduce or subdue the chances of failure in the product.

Medical Needs is a company that designs and manufactures medical devices and will be opening a new company and would like for us to do the risk management involved with the materials used for these devices and the design to ensure the devices are compliant to all regulations during production. There are many areas we will cover during this project to ensure that a quality product is available for the public consumer. We are looking at completing this project in less than six months before the manufacturing process commences.

 

Method (Agile or Waterfall)

. We will be using an Agile Method to conduct this risk assessment. The agile approach with more checkpoints, lets you refine what you are building for the customer, and what they are ultimately provided in the end user.  Agile provides the opportunity to take what you created, give it to a client, and evoke feedback. Based on the feedback, you can determine whether you are going in the right direction. If changes are required, you give yourself the opportunity to adapt and adjust.

When developing medical devices, many inputs that must be taken into consideration. Identify the needs of the end user but understand the potential risks that the product may present to end users and ensure that your product is sufficiently safe and effective by designing risk modification into your medical device. When using the agile process, you must understand how the Risk management process fits in, and then consolidate that approach into the project development plan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall Risk Management Strategy

The strategy being used for risk management will involve four different steps:

Risk Analysis: Analytical use of available information to realize hazards and estimate a risk. Risk Estimation: Process used to assign values to the probability of incident and severity of harm. Risk Assessment:  Overall process involving a risk analysis and risk evaluation. Risk Evaluation:  Process of comparing the estimated risk against given risk criteria to determine the acceptability of the risk. These four methods will be combined to create a competent risk management strategy. During every step, the company representatives and myself will be weekly to discuss how to proceed with the specific areas to perform analysis and estimations in order to come up with the Risk Evaluation.

Risk Categories

In order to comply with the ISO 14971 standards. at the beginning of each design project a design plan is created. The design plan should include a risk management plan section, or a separate risk management plan shall be created. The risk management plan only needs to cover from the beginning of the project to product release–not post-market risk activities. The risk management plan during the design phase shall include at least the following elements:

Medical device-related deaths and serious injuries: What serious adverse events related to this medical device were known when FDA authorized the device for marketing? Were there any variations in serious adverse events among subpopulations.

Likelihood of Risk: How frequently does this specific failure mode or defect occur? Has the rate of medical device failures increased? Has the mean time between failures decreased? How many medical devices are expected to have a problem? What proportion of patients treated with or diagnosed by the nonconforming medical device is harmed? How many patients were exposed to nonconforming devices? How many patients were exposed to a device manufactured by a noncompliant manufacturer?

Risk Factors for healthcare professionals or caregivers: Are there any changes in frequency or severity of risks for healthcare professionals and/or caregivers? Do any changes in the frequency or severity of risk for the healthcare provider or caregiver impact the risks to the patient?

 

 

Project Risk Identification Project Risks

Describe at least 5 risks that can occur in your project based on the categories you determined in Unit 1.

Risk Register

List the risks in the Risk Register, provide detailed descriptions of the risks, and discuss the potential impacts on the project if the risk events occur.

Risk Category Description of Risk Potential Impact on Project
     
     
     
     
     

 

 

 

Project Risk Analyses TB

Qualitative Risk Analysis

Perform a qualitative risk analysis on the risks, and determine the priority of the risks using the probability and impact matrix.

 

Risk Probability of Occurrence Potential Impact
     
     
     
     
     

 

 

 

Quantitative Risk Analysis

Perform a quantitative risk analysis on the risks that have been prioritized, and complete the quantitative risk analysis results matrix.

Risk Probability of Occurrence Potential Impact
     
     
     
     
     

 

 

 

Project Risk Response Strategy TB

Risk Response Strategy

Describe the risk response strategies for each of your risks.

Risk Risk Response Strategy Description of Risk Response
     
     
     
     
     

 

 

Project Risk Controlling TB

Plan for Reviewing Risk Responses

Discuss your plan for reviewing the risk responses.

Identification of New Risks

Discuss the plan for identifying new risks in your project.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Risk Communications Plan TB

Communications Matrix

Complete the communications matrix for discussing risk elements with your stakeholders.

 

Stakeholder Risk Content Method Frequency
       
       
       
       
       

 

Memo to the Project Sponsor

Write a memo to the project sponsor describing the risk approach, the appropriateness of the risk identification process, an overview of the risk analyses activities, the responses strategies you did not use, and improvement ideas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Project Management Institute. (2009). Practice standard for project risk management.  [Vitalsource version]. Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781933890388/cfi/0!/4/4@0.00:0.00

Project Management Institute, A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide), Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute Inc. 2013. [Vitalsource version]. Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781935589815/cfi/0

 

Discuss the technical aspects of your topic in general terms.

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Term Paper Requirements:

  • ·  Discuss the technical aspects of your topic in general terms.
  • ·  Discuss the public policy debates relevant to the topic you choose. This section should cover arguments

that are in favor of and opposed to the use of the techniques or products.

  • ·  Express your personal opinion regarding the importance of the topic and the validity of the pro and con

arguments.

  • ·  It is expected that you have the following:

o A title page
o The body of the paper: 4-6 pages of text, double-spaced, 12 point font with clear and

understandable language with no grammar or spelling errors. Provide adequate justification that supports your response with at least three appropriate references using textbooks, websites, and articles are required.

o Subheadings (technical aspect, public policy, and personal opinion/conclusion.)
o Appropriate in-text citations throughout paper
o A reference page with only the sources that you used in the body of the paper. Sources should be

less than 5 years old unless there has not been recent research available. At least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a profession journal. Do not use Wikipedia or encyclopedia as they are not considered a reliable academic source to use.

o Appropriate formatting as per APA 6th ed. website: http://owl.english.purdue.edu Grading (300 possible points total)

 

Final Paper Rubric

Meets Expectations 80-100% Approaches Expectations 60-79% Does Not Meet Expectations 0-59%
Content 50% Paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts.

Paper includes several high- quality, thought- provoking ideas.

Topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.

Paper does not demonstrate that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts.

Paper includes few, if any, thought-provoking ideas or unique insights to the discussion.

Topic is not focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.

The paper indicates no understanding of the concepts in the course.

The paper lacks any exploration of the subject by the author.

The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment.

Organization/ Cohesiveness 20% Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant.

Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas.

Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful.

Connections among subtopics are missing or forced.

Conclusion is unclear or disconnected from the topic.

Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing.

Connections among subtopics are missing. Subtopics are not presented.

Conclusion is missing or disconnected from the topic.

Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present.

Supporting Evidence/Research 20% Three or more appropriate sources are completely and eloquently integrated throughout the paper.

At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer- reviewed materials.

Detailed, meaningful quotations and paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic.

Fewer than three appropriate sources are used.

At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer- reviewed materials.

Quotations and paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics.

Sources are missing.

Paper lacks quotations and paraphrases.

Mechanics and APA 10% The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references.

No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed.

No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page.

Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

 

CJ205 Juvenile Delinquency  

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

CJ205 Juvenile Delinquency

Core Learning Outcomes

  1. Identify the many diverse views and perspectives that characterize the study of juvenile delinquency and reflect its interdisciplinary nature.
  2. Interpret the theory, law, policy, and practice in the study of the juvenile system and relate the juvenile system to the adult.
  3. Apply current information about the juvenile justice system in theory and practice.
  4. Recognize the complexity of social, political, and economic systems and problems and develop ways to contribute to the solution of such problems as they involve the juvenile justice system.

Core Assessment

Students will write two (2) Essays discussing the following issues:

ISSUE #1: The impact that media (i.e., television, video games, and music) has on delinquency.

ISSUE #2: How to reduce the incidence of the human trafficking of children.

In each essay, the student will formulate a reaction statement on the controversial issue, articulate the opinions from other source, and reach a personal opinion. All submissions must include the following technical components:

  • Minimum length: Each essay will be five to six pages (i.e., 1,250-1,500 words) in length.
  • An abstract, reference page, and a cover page will be included in each essay, but will not count as part of the minimum page (word) length.
  • A minimum of five sources will be used to locate opinions on the provided topics. Sources must be from peer-reviewed scholarly journals from the Park University electronic databases.
  • Essays must be in APA format.

Rubric

CJ205 Essay Rubric

CJ205 Essay Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation Outcomes 1-4
40.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations: Each essay demonstrates a thorough appraisal of the researched information. The essays are presented as a congruous and thoughtful exposition of a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system.

27.0 pts

Meets Expectations: Each essay demonstrates a satisfactory appraisal of the researched information. The essays are presented as a thoughtful exposition of a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system.

13.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations: Each essay demonstrates a minimal appraisal of the researched information. The essays are presented as a disparate exposition of a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system.

0.0 pts

No Evidence: Each essay demonstrates no appraisal of the researched information. The essays are presented as an incongruous exposition of a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis Outcomes 1-5
40.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations: Each essay is a consolidated integration of opinions related to a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system. Research is extended well beyond minimum requirements.

27.0 pts

Meets Expectations: Each essay presents opinions of a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system, but integration is weak. Research meets the minimum requirements

13.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations: Each essay present opinions of a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system, but without integration or consolidation of ideas. Research does not meet minimum requirements

0.0 pts

No Evidence: No evidence of combining researched material into a consistent whole.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis Outcomes 1-4
40.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations: Each essay completely examines the opinions surrounding a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system. The analysis uses more than five sources.

27.0 pts

Meets Expectations: Each essay examines the opinions surrounding a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system. The analysis uses 4-5 sources.

13.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations: Each essay fails to satisfactorily examine a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system. The analysis uses 1-4 sources.

0.0 pts

No Evidence: Each essay fails to examine a controversial issue in the juvenile justice system. It uses no sources.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication Outcomes 1-5
40.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations: Each essay shows multiple instances and exceptional understanding of terminology and concepts specific to the issue selected.

27.0 pts

Meets Expectations: Each essay shows sufficient instances and satisfactory understanding of terminology and concepts specific to the issue selected.

13.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations: Each essay shows minimal use of terminology and concepts specific to the issue selected.

0.0 pts

No Evidence: Each essay fails to demonstrate an understanding of terminology and concepts specific to the issue selected.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent of Communication Outcomes 1-4
40.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations: Each essay conveys complete and exceptional information on the fundamental principles of the issue selected.

27.0 pts

Meets Expectations: Each essay conveys sufficient information on the fundamental principles of the issue selected.

13.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations: Each essay conveys minimal information on the fundamental principles of the issue selected.

0.0 pts

No Evidence: Each essay conveys no information on the fundamental principles of the issue selected.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnical Skill in Communicating Outcomes 1-4
30.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations: Each essay contains all required technical components: 5 – 6 pages in length (excluding required cover and reference pages), typed, double-spaced. Written in APA style. Contains fewer than five grammatical or spelling errors.

20.0 pts

Meets Expectations: Each essay contains most required technical components. Contains more than five grammatical or spelling errors but errors do not detract from understanding. Written in APA style, but may have a few formatting errors.

10.0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations: Each essay contains few required technical components. Contains more than five grammatical or spelling errors that detract from understanding. APA style usage is barely evident.

0.0 pts

No Evidence: Each essay contains no required technical components. There are so many errors in the APA writing convention, in the paper presentation, or in grammar and/or spelling that it is difficult to read.

30.0 pts
Total Points: 230.0

 

In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources.

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of research for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based practice (EBP) is to employ a three-pronged approach blending the best available research evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical expertise.

In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources. You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest.

Requirements:

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. Use the Turnitin Originality Report available in Taskstream as a guide for this measure of originality.

The rubric provides detailed criteria for evaluating your submission. You are expected to use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Note: Research evidence must not be more than ten years old.

Note: Be sure to upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission.

A.  Evaluate a primary quantitative research peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

1.  Identify how the researcher addresses the five following areas of the selected journal article, using the attached “Evidence Table”:

•   background or introduction

•   review of the literature

•   discussion of methodology

•   data analysis

•   researcher’s conclusion

2.  Critique whether the evidence presented in each section of the journal article supports the researcher’s conclusion.

Note: The attached “Evidence Table” may be used to address A1. A2-A5 may be addressed on the same page under the table.

Note: Try to think about how the first four sections in the A1 table support the fifth section, the conclusion.

3.  Explain the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations of the journal article.

4.  Identify strengths and limitations of the study.

5.  Describe how the evidence informs nursing practice.

B.  Evaluate a primary qualitative research peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

1.  Identify how the researcher addresses the five following areas of the selected journal article, using the attached “Evidence Table”:

•   background or introduction

•   review of the literature

•   discussion of methodology

•   data analysis

•   researcher’s conclusion

2.  Critique whether the evidence presented in each section of the journal article supports the researcher’s conclusion.

Note: The attached “Evidence Table” may be used to address B1. B2-B5 may be addressed on the same page under the table.

Note: Try to think about how the first four sections in the B1 table support the fifth section, the conclusion.

3.  Explain the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations of the journal article.

4.  Identify strengths and limitations of the study.

5.  Describe how the evidence informs nursing practice.

C.  Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline.

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Introduction:

There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of research for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based practice (EBP) is to employ a three-pronged approach blending the best available research evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical expertise.

In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources. You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest.

Requirements:

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. Use the Turnitin Originality Report available in Taskstream as a guide for this measure of originality.

The rubric provides detailed criteria for evaluating your submission. You are expected to use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Note: Research evidence must not be more than ten years old.

Note: Be sure to upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission.

A.  Evaluate a primary quantitative research peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

1.  Identify how the researcher addresses the five following areas of the selected journal article, using the attached “Evidence Table”:

•   background or introduction

•   review of the literature

•   discussion of methodology

•   data analysis

•   researcher’s conclusion

2.  Critique whether the evidence presented in each section of the journal article supports the researcher’s conclusion.

Note: The attached “Evidence Table” may be used to address A1. A2-A5 may be addressed on the same page under the table.

Note: Try to think about how the first four sections in the A1 table support the fifth section, the conclusion.

3.  Explain the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations of the journal article.

4.  Identify strengths and limitations of the study.

5.  Describe how the evidence informs nursing practice.

B.  Evaluate a primary qualitative research peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

1.  Identify how the researcher addresses the five following areas of the selected journal article, using the attached “Evidence Table”:

•   background or introduction

•   review of the literature

•   discussion of methodology

•   data analysis

•   researcher’s conclusion

2.  Critique whether the evidence presented in each section of the journal article supports the researcher’s conclusion.

Note: The attached “Evidence Table” may be used to address B1. B2-B5 may be addressed on the same page under the table.

Note: Try to think about how the first four sections in the B1 table support the fifth section, the conclusion.

3.  Explain the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations of the journal article.

4.  Identify strengths and limitations of the study.

5.  Describe how the evidence informs nursing practice.

C.  Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

Describe the probability and impact matrix and explain how it can be used in your project?

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Deliverable Length:  350–600 words

Describe at least 5 specific risks that can occur in your project.

*The project is building a bridge*

How can they potentially impact the project?

What is a risk register?

Describe the probability and impact matrix and explain how it can be used in your project?

  The Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld a lower court ruling against the state of Texas,

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

  The Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld a lower court ruling against the state of Texas, penalizing it for reducing spending on special education in public schools in 2012. A new case may be filed for similar reductions in spending by Texas in 2017. Research and explain the history of special education and its funding in Texas, including lawsuits and judgements against the state. Explain the arguments presented by the plaintiffs and the state of Texas, as well as ramifications of the court rulings. Analyze your findings. Cite your sources.

1. In his speech at 5.2.1-22, what does Othello’s speech reveal about his state of mind?

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

1. In his speech at 5.2.1-22, what does Othello’s speech reveal about his state of mind? What metaphors does Othello use to describe killing Desdemona?

2. What does Othello realize about his life in his speech at 5.2.256-78? How does he exact revenge for Desdemona’s death?

3. How does Othello wish to be remembered (5.2.334-52)?